We've managed to get three good years out of this event with the same ten guys and the same two teams. Unfortunately for one team, it has resulted in the same outcome each year. Every year there are talks of mixing things up, adding players, etc. Lets take a second and explore some of the more popular options as well as the pro/cons of each:
OPTION ONE- Keep Teams the Same
Pros: The last two years the competition has come down to the last event. There has yet to be an all out blow out, so the talent is fairly even already. A healthy rivalary is already established.
Cons: The same team has lost every year.
OPTION TWO- Blow up teams, complete redraft
Pros: I got to use this picture
Cons: Eliminates already established rivalries. Risk of even more unbalanced teams.
OPTION THREE- Expansion
Pros: May even out athletic events in that it will add a pair of fresh legs for substitution purposes, or add a more athletic person on a team that needs it. Norm.
Cons: Difficult to find two people that fit the criteria of knowing everyone and understanding the good nature of the day. Risk flipping good chemistry of day by adding too competitive of individual. (ex. Past Turkey Bowl participants that have treated event like a draft combine)
OPTION FOUR- Trade Scenario #1
Chad/ Anthony swap: Team Green would get an upgrade at basketball. Team Maroon would get an established goalie, which would allow Lewis out of net.
OPTION FIVE- Trade Scenario # 2
Mike E./ Nate swap: Team Green would get an athletic upgrade all around. Team Maroon would get a rusty, out of shape goalie which would allow Lewis out of net. Could cause a Hatfield/McCoy situation between Erno cousins.
A poll will be up for a week or so to get your input. Rosters need finalized so BROIV planning can continue in a timely fashion. More polls to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment